Optimized Multi-scale fMRI Neuromark Templates derived from very large data (N~100K) was released in March, 2023 and is here supplied with three different model orders:
- A low order Independent Component Network (ICN) template, created from 25 components, yielding 11 non-artifactual networks. The network template is downloaded by clicking following link, Neuromark_fMRI_2.0_modelorder-25.nii, including a label file at Neuromark_fMRI_2.0_modelorder-25.txt.
- A high order Independent Component Network (ICN) template, created from 175 components, yielding 58 non-artifactual networks. The network template is downloaded by clicking following link, Neuromark_fMRI_2.0_modelorder-175.nii, including the label file Neuromark_fMRI_2.0_modelorder-175.txt.
- A multi-scale order Independent Component Network (ICN) template, created from 25, 50, 75, 100, 125, 150, 175, 200 components, yielding 105 non-artifactual and overlapping networks and can be downloaded by clicking following link, Neuromark_fMRI_2.1_modelorder-multi.nii, including the label file Neuromark_fMRI_2.1_modelorder-multi.txt.
Reference:
Neuromark_fMRI_1.0 network template and respective network labels
Reference:
Filtered Sliding Window Correlation. Please see Victor M. Vergara, PhD and Vince D Calhoun, PhD, “Filtered Correlation and Allowed Frequency Spectra in Dynamic Functional Connectivity”, Journal of Neuroscience Methods, July 2020.
Large ICA networks used in paper A. Iraji et al., “The spatial chronnectome reveals a dynamic interplay between functional segregation and integration”, HBM, 2019.
Autism Aggregate ICA map and labels used in paper:
Z. Fu, Y. Tu, X. Di, Y. Du, J. Sui, B. B. Biswal, Z. Zhang, N. de Lacy, V. D. Calhoun, “Transient increased thalamic-sensory connectivity and decreased whole-brain dynamism in autism”, Neuroimage 190, 2019, 191-204
Resting State Aggregate ICA maps used in papers:
- B. Rashid, E. Damaraju, G. D. Pearlson and V. D. Calhoun, “Dynamic connectivity states estimated from resting fMRI Identify differences among Schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and healthy control subjects”, Front Hum Neurosci. 2014; 8: 897.
- B. Rashid, M. Arabshirani, E. Damaraju, M. Cetin, R. Miller, G. D. Pearlson and V. D. Calhoun, “Classification of schizophrenia and bipolar patients using static and dynamic resting-state fMRI brain connectivity”, NeuroImage, Volume 134, 1 July 2016, Pages 645-657.
Data visualization in the neurosciences: overcoming the curse of dimensionality. Click here for more information
- E. A. Allen, E. B. Erhardt, V. D. Calhoun. “Data visualization in the neurosciences: overcoming the curse of dimensionality”, Neuron, 74(4), 603-608, 2012.
Resting state data from E. Allen, E. Damaraju, S. M. Plis, E. Erhardt, T. Eichele, and V. D.Calhoun, “Tracking whole-brain connectivity dynamics in the resting state”, Cereb Cortex, Nov 2012.
Resting state data from E. Allen, et al, “A baseline for the multivariate comparison of resting state networks,” Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, vol. 5, p. 12, 2011.
T-maps of 28 resting state networks. See Network Labels
T-maps of all 100 components See Component Labels
Composite T maps of 7 groups resampled to 1mm^3 space and their labels.
Mean ICA components from Stevens, V. D. Calhoun, G. D. Pearlson, and K. A. Kiehl, “Brain network dynamics during error commission,” Hum.Brain Map., vol. 30, pp. 24-37, 2009